Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlimE!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:24, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BlimE!

BlimE! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability: sole source is self-published. A merge to Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation would be a solution; I would have redirected it it was mentioned on the page, TheLongTone (talk) 13:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Blye Me! This is not serious, delete per WP:N. Ode+Joy (talk) 16:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Except for the press release from EBU, none of the sources are self-published. This is an important initiative that is increasingly being adopted by broadcasters in other countries. Henrikdv (talk)
• Keep looks like a legitimate kindness campaign. With RS to verify. Lightburst (talk) 19:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, as there are enough reliable sources to show notabilityJackattack1597 (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.