Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackberry (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blackberry (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no reviews no indepth coverage, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Dom from Paris (talk) 11:58, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete I am looking through search results at bing.com, and I'm just not seeing what needs to be there to satisfy WP:MOVIE. Weak delete because I lean on the illusionist side and I am cautious about voting for deletion, but this one doesn't seem to cut the mustard. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PCH-NJROTC: Ah I often suspected that the inclusionists were also illusionists now I have the proof!! damn you autocorrect! --Dom from Paris (talk) 15:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. To be fair though, you mispelled my username, so I suppose we are even. :-) PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 20:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Touché! As they say here in France "un point partout, balle au centre"! 1 all, kickoff from the middle Dom from Paris (talk) 08:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidecne of setisfying either WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.