Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Snow
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Black Snow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not meet notability guidelines Sillyfolkboy (talk) 00:11, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Greg Tyler (t • c) 10:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails GNG. Needs substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found. - SummerPhD (talk) 12:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – without prejudice at this time. Not enough independent coverage on web – no awards – no coverage at all in printed publications. Sorry. ShoesssS Talk 13:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not notable, even the article itself says "Copyright claim pending". ~Excesses~ (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 15:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (perhaps SNOW) per above. TheAE talk/sign 20:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.