Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Diamond Bay (UK)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Diamond Bay (UK)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Band has not released two albums, it has not recieved greater media coverage. At present it serves as a link container to iTunes. I nominate this page per failing WP:Notability. --Abracus (talk) 13:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep may not strictly meet notability, but very close. Would seem a bit pointless to delete now merely to put it back up in a month or two.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:BAND "Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network". As far as the rest, there are non-trivial mentions of their Leeds&Reading festival exploits and their status as having a popular following among Lithuanians (which is obviously unique for a British band) which, when combined with WP:BAND/11 passes the notabilty test IMHO. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 13:22, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:BAND On Radio 1 playlist according to this [1]. I think that should be the end of this discussion.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.