Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitotsav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bitotsav

Bitotsav (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially every reference here is a press release, and the article seems to be written as if it were advertising for the event. It is possible that the 2 articles in the Times of India show some borderline notability , but Lack of notability is not the only reason for deletion. Borderline notability combined with clear promotionalism is an equally good reason. DGG ( talk ) 01:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nominator. This is potentially notable, but I would still rather blow it up and start over. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete badly sourced WP:PROMO that should not have been graduated from the AfC queue. Jytdog (talk) 01:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.