Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bite Ninja, Inc.

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bite Ninja, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a startup with routine coverage. valereee (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi valereee - quite a bit of coverage on this company, including segments on top of the top news outlets in the country. Is there a way to better cite/structure the article to avoid deletion? Here's a segment from NBC's Today Show earlier this year: https://www.today.com/food/trends/fast-food-drive-thru-workers-work-home-new-technology-rcna22534 Semonative (talk) 03:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please let me know at your convenience. Really appreciate your help! Semonative (talk) 03:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Semonative[reply]
Hi valereee - any update on this? Thanks! Semonative (talk) 18:36, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Semonative[reply]
Hi, @Semonative. What we like to see for an organization is multiple articles in reliable sources that cover the business itself at length and aren't limited to local or industry media. The NBC show is possibly one. IMO it's more about the idea and the pandemic than the business itself, but it could arguably be one of the three. Which of the sources you've provided would go to that? Also, please disclose your WP:COI, as has been requested on your User talk:Semonative. That is a non-negotiable. valereee (talk) 18:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 19:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.