Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Goldberg (social worker)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 17:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Goldberg (social worker)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable anti-cult person. This person has no inherent notability, and does not pass the GNG--the sourcing is simply not there. He published a few articles, most of which not in academically sound journals, and "books" is really just a chapter in an edited collection. Drmies (talk) 03:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources, no notability. --Randykitty (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of proper sourcing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Fails to meet the requirements of any of our notability guidelines by a wide mile. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 02:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. For what it's worth, thousands of people lobby or testify annually before the New York State Legislature, including yours truly. Bearian (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only secondary source seems to be a mere mention in one book. He does not meet WP's definition of notability. BayShrimp (talk) 13:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being a guest on the Sally Jesse Raphael show, and Geraldo, apparently as an "anti-cult expert" or "activist" does not confer notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.