Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big T

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Big T

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:MUSIC. Awards aren't notable, no secondary sourcing found. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--Subject fails WP:MUSIC, WP:NOTABILITY and WP:BLP standards and requirements. All search material chases back to subjects own created articles in the majority of cases. Awards are not mainstream recognized, although that means very little as there are tons of awards out there. Finally the discography listed is not found in Soundscan or bar coded so I would assume they would fail WP:ALBUM as well.--Canyouhearmenow 11:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Fails WP:MUSICBIO, lacks significant independent coverage in reliable sources. STATic message me! 22:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.