Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother (USA season 1) nominations table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge with Big Brother (USA season 1). WikiProject Big Brother says that only tables that would break the flow of the article should get their own page, and this particular table seems not to be too large. --james^(talk) 12:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia:Not an indiscriminate collection of information.--SweetNeo85 19:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Big Brother (USA season 1). All Big Brother articles, where possible, have a nominations table or voting history, and although I don't agree with having them myself, this one looks small enough to go on the main article. --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 19:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment there is currently something messed up Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 July 16. This AfD is not showing up properly and the comments are being almagamated into the Dads Strength listing. Not sure why, a check of the edits shows everything looks fine. Could have something to do with the name of this article.--Crossmr 21:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, I think. --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 21:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup looks good.--Crossmr 21:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a member of WikiProject:Big Brother one of the precedents listed on the project page is:There are two kinds of nominations tables in use, the one used on Big Brother (UK series 1) (which should be included in the article), and the one used at Big Brother (UK series 7) nominations table (which should be in a seperate article). The type of nominations table under question would be regarded as part of the second example. Thus, this would be kept under WikiProject:Big Brother. FireSpike 02:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark 22:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Big Brother (USA season 1). There would not seem to be any reason articulated in the previous WikiProject:Big Brother guidelines for having such a small table in a completely seperate article. As it is, the 'precedent' would appear to have been recently dropped from that project page (due to new features allowing better tables? - can't really tell why). Kuru ^talk 23:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Big Brother (USA season 1). Table is not signifigant enough on its own to merit its own article. There's no context to the table by itself. You can't really understand it without reading the parent article, so it should be merged with the parent article. -- Gogo Dodo 00:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Big Brother (USA season 1), like the similar American Idol/Rockstar/etc charts. Kirjtc2 14:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• comment - So you're all saying that Big Brother (UK series 6) nominations table,Big Brother (UK series 7) nominations table, Big Brother (UK series 5) nominations table, and Big Brother (UK series 4) nominations table should be merged into their respective season articles? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FireSpike (talk • contribs) .
  • Comment, no, that would clearly not appear to be what I've suggested above. Could you rephrase your question? Kuru ^talk 03:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Big Brother (USA season 1), but the best I can tell, the information is accurate. Excellent work, finding the season one results these days is a bit tricky. Can help with other USA seasons with a little digging, just don't know how to do the tables. TampaPauly
• Comment- What I meant was that almost all of the seasons of Big Brother UK have their own nominations tables on a seperate page. Just because the first U.S. version wasn't as well known, doesn't mean that its nomination table shold be merged and not get its own page. Oh, and I'm sorry about not signing the comment I made above. FireSpike 01:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.