Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BiFest
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BiFest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 13:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sexuality and gender, and United Kingdom. Owen× ☎ 14:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, I can't find anything online and the events maxing out at 150 attendees makes it seem unlikely it would have enough coverage in offline sources to sustain an independent/notable article. AlexandraAVX (talk) 20:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.