Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhushan Shimpi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhushan Shimpi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any significant coverage in WP:RS nor any significant roles in notable productions. Looks like a failure of WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep* The Times of India's article is mentioned, makes it notable and passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darshanpatil5567 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a passing mention of him; it completely fails to establish notability. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails all notability criteria, passing mentions. And lets not even talk about the photo that is blatantly a selfie in a mirror, but the OP claims is own work. Canterbury Tail talk 21:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Does not meet NACTOR or GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. Does not meet NACTOR or GNG. Tulkijasi (talk) 07:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (as per above) Clearly, does not meet NACTOR or GNG. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:22, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ENT Aishaa14 (talk) 15:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.