Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhosadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bhosadi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a dictionary definition and is unlikely ever to be anything else. Malleus Fatuorum 21:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:DICTIONARY. --Guerillero | My Talk 21:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless reliable sources can be found that discuss the topic in depth, which seems very unlikely. Urban Dictionary is listed as a reference, which is not a reliable source. It is a user contributed website, and has no fact checking or professional editing. Cullen328 (talk) 21:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only a dictionary definition. Could be moved to Wiktionary if a reliable reference can be found. Peter E. James (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. —Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 17:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:30, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.