Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhala Thandanana

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. plicit 00:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhala Thandanana

Bhala Thandanana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bhala Thandanana

Unreleased movie that does not satisfy any version of film notability, either past, present, or proposed, or general notability. The article says nothing about significant coverage of the film, or of its production. The article doesn't even say that production was finished, only that a ceremony was held of the start of production. It should not be necessary to look at the references to determine whether a film or any other subject satisfies general notability, because the article should speak for itself. A review of the references does not show general notability. A review of the references does at least show that production was completed, and that the producers are advertising the film, but there is nothing resembling independent secondary coverage in the references.

Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary
1 teleganatoday.com A teaser about a publicity photo of the star No No No
2 thehansindia.com A teaser about the stars and the film No No No
3 timesofindia.indiatimes.com Another teaser about the film and the stars No No ? No
4 news18.com Another teaser about the film No No No
5 sakshi.com An interview says that filming was finished No Yes No
6 timesofindia.indiatimes.com Interview with second leading man No No No
7 /timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ Press release about a pooja for the start of filming. No Yes No
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.