Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Between the Walls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nom withdrawn see final comment below _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 01:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Between the Walls

There's no assertion of notability for this album. Only content of the article is a "Track listing" and a "Personnel" sections. There's also an infobox with very little information. The page's been prodded, but prod was removed, so I've gone to AfD. Victor Lopes (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC) I have changed the page , but if you consider it for deleting it is up to everyone to delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zagor4e (talk • contribs) 18:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep seems to be a notable album by a notable band. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chetblong (talk) 02:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't seem a notable album CRocka05 (talk) 03:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Wknight94 (talk) 18:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The artist is apparently notable, why isn't the album? Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've given the article a bit of a tidy up, added a ref for some of the info, and track listing. Over the next few days or so I'll give all the other albums of his that look this bad a bit of a kick in the pants too. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, now the article is way much better than before. I'm glad to say that I withdraw this nomination. Victor Lopes (talk) 15:48, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.