Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betterhumans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to George Dvorsky. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-07 06:43Z

Betterhumans

Non-notable website per WP:WEB. Sole reference is not reliable per WP:RS - it's a self-published interview. RJASE1 ^Talk 02:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. The article is referenced but I am working on getting more since the organizers of Betterhumans get interviewed by the mainstream media on a regular basis. --Loremaster 02:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Are these reliable sources that are needed to meet wikipedia's attribution policy going to be found sooner or later? NeoFreak 02:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Future reliable sources do not translate into current reliable sources. Therefore, delete, per nom. --Haemo 02:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn/does not meet WP:WEB. Leuko 02:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:WEB. If Loremaster, or anyone else, provides the multiple, independent reliable sources required I will reconsider. Nuttah68 09:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB. Captain panda In vino veritas 03:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: I've merged the content of the Betterhumans article with the George Dvorsky article so the Betterhumans page will now redirect to it. We should close this AfD debate. --Loremaster 03:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.