Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Besuds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Behsud (Hazara tribe). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Besuds

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article with single claim. The List in the see also links to this and actually contains more context than this article. I would just redirect to the list but the article creator is not allowing this. No indication of WP:notability. Nothing to say it needs its own article. noq (talk) 13:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect for now. --Hola from mola (talk) 14:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's stub article, i'll improve this page later, ok? Ancientsteppe (talk) 14:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are no sources extensively detailing the tribe itself; the only mentions are books that mention the Beshud Hazara tribe, saying that it is the only Hazara tribe to bear a Mongol name. This fails WP:GNG and for all we know, Besud could be a Mongol family name and not an ancient tribe's name, which would make this article WP:CB. Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 15:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Behsud (Hazara tribe). Unsourced, WP:OR at best. Ansh666 17:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 00:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:03, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.