Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best of the Best Championship Karate (video game)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per unanimity of responses. Non-admin closure by Skomorokh 03:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Best of the Best Championship Karate (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article was created several months ago, and absolutely nothing has been added. In addition, I feel that this is not notable enough of an article, nor was I able to find anything to suggest notability. MuZemike (talk) 21:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 21:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Article does need work but notability is not an issue. This was a commercial multi-platform release. -Rushyo (talk) 22:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, if only for this one reason - the user assumes that notability does not exist and, in addition to this, never once discusses the matter of notability or apparently makes any effort to create a group effort with the editors of the article, who just might know where to find the sources. - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - according to WP:TOYS (which it should be noted is just a proposal at the moment), any licensed console game that has been published and widely released is likely to be notable. I dare say any game released on the NES would qualify. Bettia (rawr CRUSH!) 15:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - short, but no reason not to assume notability --T-rex 20:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.