Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bespoke Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bespoke Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:GNG and there are no sources I can locate that establish WP:CORPDEPTH. CNMall41 (talk) 22:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom, a non-notable company. Possible fails WP:MILL given the subject company's scope is likely covered by other articles.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP, no indications of notability. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 19:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.