Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernt Ullmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Doc James. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bernt Ullmann

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suspect paid editing. Editor blocked. Shows all the classic signs of paid editing. Pieced together from primary sources and press releases. No substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources. Allmost all references mention Ullman as the source of a quote,anf never offer anything substantial about the subject. Obvious attempt at WP:CITEKILL; using many references in an attempt to hide the lack of substance. One reference (8) is even about whether it's "a MBA" or "an MBA".

[1] is primary source
[2]primary source, 1 mention, no details
[3] only mentioned as the source of a quote
[4] is from the Daily News record
[5] only used as source of a quote
[6] only used as source of a quote
[7] is a website about which indefinite article to use with MBA
[8] looks like in-depth coverage, but is his own website
[9] is an affiliated source
[10] "according to" Bernt Ullmann
[11] is an interview with Ullmann
[12] is PR piece from PR Newswire
[13] is his own website
[14] only used as source of a quote
[15] is a press release
[16] is a press release
[17] is only used as source of a quote
[18] only used as source of a quote
[19] only used as source of a quote
[20] "said Bernt Ullmann"

Mduvekot (talk) 15:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:39, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. This appears to be a large paid editing firm. Have deleted the article based on G5 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:32, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.