Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Hiller

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Hiller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was cleaning this up, but the moment you start cleaning the promotional crap out of an article like this, there's nothing left. There are no reliable sources, there are no real, verified achievements, even the filmography is questionable. So, remove per GNG--just another vanispam article, with heavy COI edits by a now-blocked person whose name is an awful lot like that of the subject. Drmies (talk) 22:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Bernie Hiller has undoubtedly some influence as an acting coach. The documentary 'Pink Elephants' is about him and his work. And he was in some festival jurys. In my eyes, that makes him a relevant person. Sure, the article was pure advertising, but now it's better. The sources are o.k. and there is a criticism-section, too. As far as I know, Pink Elephants is only available in german. But at the latest when there are english subtitles in this documentary, people are asking for a Wikipedia article. Django.Muerte (talk) 23:15, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This conversation was reopened by request from an uninvolved user. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk- 13:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per Praxidicae in a discussion on my talk page, this needs more discussion before closing. (Non-administrator comment)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ―Matthew J. Long -Talk- 13:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per nom. The "Filmography" section is sourced with IMDb (user-generated) that is not reliable or acceptable as a reference. Otr500 (talk) 02:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Article is still so promitionally written. There are some references in RS, but media-BLPs throw up refences quickly (by definition from their industry). There is no proper article on the subject (as opposed to referring to him in the context of another subject) in a significant RS (e.g. NYT interview). A notable acting coach, given the industry, would have at least one strong interview in a major publication. Britishfinance (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.