Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernadette Kémenes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There are no arguments in this discussion for keeping the article, which was borderline speediable as A7 and G11 to begin with. Drmies (talk) 17:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bernadette Kémenes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's really not clear to me what the claim of notability is here, or how any of the sources might demonstrate that this individual passes WP:BIO. What is clear is the conflict of interest: the article creator is the nearly single-purpose account SZERVÁC Attila; Kémenes, the article informs us, has worked with Attila Szervác. - Biruitorul ^Talk 19:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I regularly edit articles on Hungarian artist guys and girls, e. g. Ágnes Simor, Bernadette Kémenes etc.

I know that there are issues between Romanian and Hungarian people, but I think Wikipedia English and Hungarian is not the platform of this debate. This is a right Article about a very importan and influental young Hungarian multiple award-winner artist with proper references and a self-portrait. Sources references to her awards, works.

(there are no conflits of interest, if You are bothered by the sentence references to common artistic work of the Artist and editor, just feel free to delete this sentence! :-)) Otherwise it's absolutely clear, that this article is proper & passes the criteria of a Notable & influental international Artist :) SZERVÁC Attila (talk) 20:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, your edits are not "regular"; you've made 22 edits to Wikipedia. The last fifteen have been about Kémenes. All but one of the edits you've made this year (and that one was in March) have been related to Kémenes.

It is immaterial to me whether Kémenes is Hungarian or Romanian or Khmer or Navajo. The salient question is whether she is notable, and for that we have no particular evidence.

Simply saying someone is notable does not magically make that person notable. Neither does receipt of an award automatically translate into notability. It can, of course, but it can also be the case that the award is irrelevant in encyclopedic terms. If you want this article kept, you have to demonstrate, convincingly, that Kémenes somehow meets at least one of the criteria set out at WP:ARTIST. You have not done so. - Biruitorul ^Talk 22:22, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG IMO; also some SPIP going on, I think. Quis separabit? 20:37, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.