Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benny Luo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to NewMediaRockstars. Black Kite (talk) 10:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Benny Luo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant notability outside NewMediaRockstars (which is itself at AfD has itself just survived AfD as "no consensus"). Recommend redirect to said parent article. Swpbtalk 14:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Swpbtalk 14:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Swpbtalk 15:00, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

('Delete The redirect will be sufficient. (even if we end up keeping that article, which I will nominate again for afD. It received insufficient attention, but I am think that if it does received attention, it will be deleted. ) DGG ( talk ) 09:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.