Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben T. Smith, IV
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –MuZemike 04:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ben T. Smith, IV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable person, despite inevitable claims to the contrary. Coverage is skimpy and not directly or significantly about him; almost every one of these hits are PR or otherwise non-RS sources. Drmies (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Not notable. I searched a few days ago, and I've searched again to no avail. I'm finding mostly coverage as a spokesperson for MerchantCircle; it seems he's adequately covered at that article. As far as a stand-alone article, this subject clearly fails WP:GNG because he is not the subject of non-trivial third-party coverage in his own right. Upon examining coverage involving this subject in relation to his former position, his coverage is still mostly in passing (trivial/unsubstantial) among WP:RS. JFHJr (㊟) 19:48, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lack of specific treatment by reliable sources. — Racconish Tk 21:10, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A few press releases doesn't show notability. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He does seem to have been CEO of MerchantCirlce, but that does not meet the threshold of notability. Thomas_S_Burns (talk) 22:21 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking WP:RS Stuartyeates (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.