Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Behrouzi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Behrouzi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any real coverage for him in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 17:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~*keep~~ sources prove us its notable also this article has created about for 8 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifeisstudyinghard (talk • contribs) 14:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC) — Lifeisstudyinghard (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. </ Editor indef blocked for socking as per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amirshahat.[reply]

delete. Article is overstuffed with paltry and self-sorucing. I ran a gNews search and found minor coverage on a startup he, well, started in 2013, UrthBox, which does get some news coverage [1]. However, no SIGCOV of Behrouzi. Looks like it's WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG not notable at this point upcoming a case of WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.