Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belle (2010 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:53, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Belle (2010 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film hasn't begun principle photography, hence fails WP:NFF. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 18:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- --Darkwind (talk) 19:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was unable to find any verification through Google and Gnews that principal photography had begun. A project is not a film until principal photography begins and per WP:NFF, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." No prejudice towards recreation once principal photography begins and notability can be proven. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:40, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice per nom and Big Bird: no verification that principal photography has begun. Cliff smith ^talk 21:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.