Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beijing Bus No. 360 Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beijing Bus No. 360 Express

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A trivial article with no claim of notability or significance. PROD was deleted with "This is a necessary page which can help passengers learn about the bus route so that it is convenient for them.", which is not the purpose of Wikipedia. Coderzombie (talk) 12:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree that this not notable for Wikipedia.Seaweed (talk) 17:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTTIMETABLE, WP:NOTGUIDE; we aint no free webhost for municipal transport. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 18:21, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Please. Doesn't belong here. Samf4u (talk) 18:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Trivia with no evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It appears that for other cities, we have lists of bus routes, but not articles for each individual bus route, so there seems to be a consensus that this kind of thing is not notable. --Danaman5 (talk) 01:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. There are external reliable sources about this bus route, and contrary to many comments above that bus route articles don't belong, we do have individual articles for most London bus routes. Deryck C. 15:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly surprising since some of them are over a century old. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 07:14, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not sure how this passes gng Chetsford (talk) 05:05, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.