Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bees Bagla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 02:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bees Bagla

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page consists completely of original research (including lots of unencyclopedic information) and has been this way since at least 2011. Searching for this place online, it seems likely that it exists (there's a Facebook page about it, and it's included on weather sites) but there is not a single reliable source about it. Even if I'm wrong about the latter and this place is notable, judging by the condition of the article and the lack of improvement over the past decade, WP:TNT seems applicable. (To avoid confusion: the place is in Pakistan, not in India as the article currently states, this seems to have been changed at some point.)Lennart97 (talk) 23:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Goldsztajn: did a fantastic job at cleaning the article up (thank you very much!), so I think this discussion can be safely closed as Keep. Lennart97 (talk) 11:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 23:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Facebook and weather sites auto-generate pages from various databases and are not useful for verifiability. Per USAID, this is a genuine village in Pakistan and likely notable. OR in the article may be freely removed. Reywas92^Talk 02:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the USAID source. Seems this is definitely a village, appears to pass GEOLAND. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:GEOLAND as per the two editors above; the OR should be removed after this AfD concludes but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater Spiderone 08:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep made a clean up and added sourcing. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:50, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GEOLAND.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yes better after clean up. Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.