Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bed and Sofa (musical)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @187 · 03:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Bed and Sofa (musical) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete no indication that this musical is notable; no refs and barely any context in this one-liner Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Thryduulf (talk) 21:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —Thryduulf (talk) 21:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Reviewed by the NY Times, though I haven't found any others. Perhaps the best thing would be to have an article on the 1927 film (more clearly notable) and include info about the musical. Very difficult to find an RS that isn't based on the movie, which seems to comprise most of the 18,000+ ghits. If the film had an article, I would vote to merge. Matt Deres (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC) update: I have created an article about the film and brought over what little there was in the musical in a separate section. I am still neutral regarding the deletion as I'm still unsure of notability of the musical on its own. Matt Deres (talk) 20:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have switched from neutrality. The article about the film covers the topic decently and there's room for further details if needed. Should the play take off or a bunch more info become available, then a split can always be done. Matt Deres (talk) 01:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.