Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatport Music Awards (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. if its not notable anmd the consensus is it isn't then we wouldn't want to merge it into the amin article Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:40, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beatport Music Awards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable award from a single store. No indepentent sources or claims of notability. No non promotional sources found. Nothing suggests it is anything more than spam. Previous afd closed as no consensus due to lack of participation. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:20, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 12:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no source for notability. Also guilty of abuse of flag icons (WP:MOSFLAG), though that's not ground for deletion by itself...--137.122.49.102 (talk) 14:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- These are annual awards given by the dance music store, www.beatport.com Several notable artists such as Deadmau5 and Armin van Buuren have been nominated for them, this article simply needs a source. Tarheel95 (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Giving awards to notable people does not make the awards themselves notable.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Very selectively Merge into Beatport without prejudice for recreation should notability be established sufficiently for a dedicated article. ~~The topic might be notable as there is independent coverage in multiple reliable sources in multiple languages.~~ However there is little in the current article worth saving, it's a mess of original research and overuse of Wiki formatting.--~~RadioFan (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)~~ --RadioFan (talk) 13:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- perhaps we could merge this article into Beatport? Tarheel95 (talk) 01:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thats a fine idea. I've updated my !vote to reflect your suggestion.--RadioFan (talk) 13:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.