Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beak Street (Manhattan) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beak Street (Manhattan)

Very small road in northern Manhattan (only one block long) that has no inherent notability. Was previously nominated for deletion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/79th Street (Manhattan); the result was "keep", but this road is nowhere near as major as all the others in that group. Schzmo (talk) 01:29, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Ezeu (talk) 01:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, for now. Even 1 block streets can be notable and being in "northern Manhattan" is not a valid reason to delete an article.--Oakshade (talk) 02:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. JBsupreme (talk) 08:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article already has one source that isn't a random database and the text implies it might have historical significance. Perhaps we should ask CORNELIUSSEON if there's any chance of expansion. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- We cannot have an article on every street in every city in every country in the world. This is (as far as the article goes) a NN street, and the article must be deleted unless substantial notable information can be provided on it. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and comment immediately above. --Triadian (talk) 23:16, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep there are sources from which we might be able to add history. Nowhere near as major is not a criteria for deletion last time I checked. Weak because I'm not going to have a ton of time to work on this. StarM 01:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a travel guide, and the article fails to demonstrate how or why this street could possibly be conceived as "notable" within the context of an encyclopedia. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 19:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.