Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beacon Hill Women's Forum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:57, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beacon Hill Women's Forum

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the subject's coverage comes from Beacon Hill Times, thus lacking significant coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains^(talk) 02:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's nothing wrong with local coverage, but the coverage in Beacon Hill Times fails WP:ORGIND, either promoting an event (e.g. 1) or being written by a non-independent author who is listed as a speaker at the group's events (e.g. 2). --Pontificalibus 09:08, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.