Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bassivity Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bassivity Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possibly non-notable company. Only 6 hits on Google news, all of them 1 sentence mentions. Page has been tagged with 4 notices expressing the lack of notability. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not a notable record label. If someone wants a project that will take a long time, just start going through articles on record labels and try to either find enough sourcing to justify keeping them or nominate them for deletion. This is one of the cases where we have the largest grouping of undersourced articles, second only to cricket players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Only visible in very brief listings at industry databases plus its own social media pages. Does not satisfy the requirements at WP:NCOMPANY or for that matter WP:EXIST. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Per rationale by nom, Johnpacklambert & Doomsdayer520 respectively. Celestina007 (talk) 18:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, JPL and Doomsdayer. Non-notable label. The interwikis doesn't contain any independent, reliable sources either, might I add. (The Serbian page cites lots of sources, but upon closer inspection, they are not notable, as many of them are unreliable databases and similar sites.) GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 16:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: as above, not a notable label. References do not give notability. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above; I also think that the notability of its subsidiary Bassivity Digital is highly questionable Spiderone 13:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.