Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barzakh Ke Phool
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Barzakh Ke Phool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The situation is somewhat similar to WP:CSD#A9: there is no claim of importance for this book of poetry and we can't redirect to the article on the author since that article (Javaid Anwar) was deleted once as A7, once at AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javaid Anwar) once as G4, and ultimately salted. Pichpich (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a non-notable book with citation as amazon. Exploreandwrite (talk) 08:58, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet WP:NBOOK - Epinoia (talk) 22:02, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.