Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baramulla Public School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 00:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Baramulla Public School

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL Sungodtemple (talk) 00:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Sungodtemple (talk) 00:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak keep.~~Delete The article looks like auto-generated content. The article is young and perhaps some other editors can continue to grow it. Ew3234 (talk) 02:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While it claims to be founded in 1994, it likely not an established school from google seaching around. Changing to delete. Ew3234 (talk) 02:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Completely non-notable. I was nomming editor for CSD, but that was removed. JesseRafe (talk) 13:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the school does not satisfy WP:NSCHOOLS. WP:BEFORE shows no sources to support WP:GNG either. VV 08:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's a few brief name drops in articles about other stuff, but that's about it. From what I could find there is nothing out there on this that would help it pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this article is very weak. Catfurball (talk) 20:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.