Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bada Business

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bada Business

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The organization doesn’t satisfy WP:NCORP as they do no have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A WP:BEFORE search hits in sponsored posts such as this overtly promotional piece and other unreliable sources. Their sole claim to notability is beating a previous record ”for the biggest online lesson” held by a different organization, which is trivial and negligible at best. This article is definitely a subtle WP:ADMASQ. Celestina007 (talk) 22:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom _signed,Sharath Abhivadyah ^{Talk Page} 05:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Souces and news fails GNG and NCORP. Sliekid (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added more reliable sources as you have mentioned and removed any text that may violate Wikipedia policy. I hope it has now satisfied all Wikipedia norms. Still there is any things which can be improved, please suggest. Editorpreeti (talk) 18:10, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Current news Souces fails in meeting GNG and NCORP. DmitriRomanovJr (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are few and unreliable. Expertwikiguy (talk) 08:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete , Not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 09:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nom, sources examined don't meet WP:NCORP. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NCORP. Spudlace (talk) 05:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 17:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.