Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babysitters Beware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:54, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Babysitters Beware

Babysitters Beware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was prodded back in June and recently recreated. A direct to DVD film, which fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a school. Removing from WP:SCHOOLS AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:38, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Onel5969, link to the deletion page? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Edit: I found it. See public log for page --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:21, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and per the fact that it was previously PRODed as being failing WP:NFILM --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:29, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for subject failing WP:NFILM. My turn to pick up the popcorn debris. -The Gnome (talk) 10:41, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I gave this the good old college try as far as source finding goes, but there's just one lone review out there - not enough to pass NFILM. You'd think that more people would be willing to review a Trejo film, but apparently not this one. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.