Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Police" on Wikipedia
- a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC) Baby Police (edit |...12 KB (1,373 words) - 13:20, 5 February 2023
- January 2013 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Baby Police Articles for deletion/Baby Police (2nd nomination) Baby Police (edit | talk | history |...5 KB (385 words) - 13:21, 5 February 2023
- verify the existence, leadership of, and activities of this police force. And the newspaper articles from The Hindu (cited above), New Indian Express, The Hindu...4 KB (420 words) - 23:18, 6 February 2023
- a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 05:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC) Baby Jesus...35 KB (4,939 words) - 10:31, 19 February 2022
- deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:14, 12 March 2011 (UTC) Los Angeles Police...4 KB (432 words) - 07:21, 4 February 2022
- (e.g., Police authority, Police Complaints Board, Police Act 1946) Notable police individuals (e.g., Frank Serpico,Shirley McKie). For articles concerning...4 KB (470 words) - 11:52, 16 November 2023
- for improvement rather than deletion (per WP:ATD and "don't throw the baby out with the WP:BATHWATER"). However, there are a few reasons why deletion...27 KB (3,378 words) - 04:18, 19 March 2022
- nomination for this list. The last debate was held in 2005 and reached no consensus see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slang and offensive terms for police officers...17 KB (2,305 words) - 07:19, 4 February 2022
- available for that film. In 2010 the Baby Police article was taken to AfD and subsequently deleted. In April 2012 a new editor re-created the deleted Baby Police...20 KB (2,612 words) - 10:54, 8 February 2023
- existing articles. THF (talk) 22:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC) Smerge selectively back into Powers of arrest and/or peace officer. Do not throw out the babies with...8 KB (996 words) - 16:45, 8 February 2022
- (Geez, how can it be any less notable than fuzzy dice or vorpal or tar baby?) VigilancePrime (talk) 07:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Delete Very narrow scope...4 KB (458 words) - 14:08, 2 February 2022
- deletion refers to an overwhelming desire to get articles or other materials on Wikipedia deleted. This essay is not in total opposition to deletion....24 KB (3,437 words) - 02:46, 7 June 2024
- August 2009 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Russian influence operations in Estonia Articles for deletion/Russian influence operations...18 KB (2,181 words) - 20:44, 26 May 2022
- logs | views) Indiscriminate information, no better than a List of American police dramas aired in the United Kingdom, or a List of American cartoons aired...4 KB (374 words) - 12:45, 7 February 2023
- I'd be for that idea. George Washington and Abraham Lincoln don't need articles. Dough4872 03:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Keep per the fun police. –Fredddie™...9 KB (715 words) - 19:44, 28 January 2023
- for this article: Articles for deletion/Generation Jones Articles for deletion/Generation Jones (2nd nomination) Articles for deletion/Generation Jones...7 KB (66,766 words) - 04:55, 5 April 2022
- at the scene by the police was immediately labeled as a "suicide note."" It specifically states that the note was found by police (reading other stories...57 KB (4,275 words) - 02:43, 10 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Encourage full discussions (category Wikipedia essays about deletion)efforts. DeleteItBaby 4:01, 4 April 2004 (UTC) If one editor has a position in an articles for deletion discussion (or any other discussion for that matter)...3 KB (291 words) - 18:29, 11 July 2024
- means but deleting it is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Really, there are other pages that need policing more that the language stubs. Akerbeltz...5 KB (458 words) - 20:36, 25 May 2022
- support deletion of that article. --RegentsPark (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2010 (UTC) Switching to keep wikitravel. No sense in throwing out the baby with the...53 KB (7,377 words) - 03:58, 13 March 2023
- 2007 (UTC) Again, there is no legal risk for WMF in hosting (to use the same example) the Lindbergh Baby's ransom note. Since there is no verifiable
- topics that were previously on the Wikiquote:Votes for deletion page. The votes on these articles resulted either in keeping them intact or moving them