Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babar Luck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 11:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Babar Luck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Fails WP:N and WP:MUSIC. GrapedApe (talk) 04:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not understand why this page is being considered for deletion. Artist is a notable artist with longstanding musical history. Refer links — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.60.110 (talk) 21:43, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep based on a quick search: The Independent, The Guardian, 20 Minutes, Alt-UK, Music Ohm. That, in addition to the already cited RS New Internationalist and NU-Metal, appears to be enough for a claim of notability. Cavarrone (talk) 07:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Add Meadly, Phil (26 May 2006), "ROCK & POP: I use brains - and fists'", The Independent which is a >1200 word feature article. His old band is also notable. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.