Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIX Malaysia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 09:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BIX Malaysia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability requirements. only one source article also draft moved by creator itself. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 19:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 19:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 19:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 19:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I believe the subject is notable and meets WP:GNG and found this source, this source and this source. An article with this title was speedily deleted on or about 6 July 2018, for G11 I think, but this article seems satisfactory in that respect. The present version needs attention and I will add the sources I have found. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Sources found by Cwmhiraeth, also these [1][2][3] should satisfy WP:GNG. I should imagine such sharia-compliant financial set up is significant in a Muslim-majority country. Hzh (talk) 12:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Sufficient coverage found by Cwmhiraeth and Hzh. I'd feel more comfortable if it wasn't all coverage of the launch, which all seem to be almost the same article, even if from different sources, but then it's been open less than a year, so we can only expect so much. --GRuban (talk) 16:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.