Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. V. Ramana Reddy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

B. V. Ramana Reddy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No highly cited publications hence does not satisfy NACADEMIC. No RS to support GNG. Professional position bears no notability either. Vikram Vincent 15:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 15:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 15:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It may not be enough for notability, but I'm not sure where the nominator gets "no publications" from. Apart from a couple of papers about diabetes the results of the Google Scholar search linked above are clearly by the subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Phil Bridger. My bad. Changed. Vikram Vincent 12:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete his google scholar profile clearly contains publications from someone else as well, I dont think an architect has publications in gynecology. Removing those by other people, not many publications and citations are left. More accurately probably because not conflated, Microsoft Academic has him at 12 publications and 29 citations which fails WP:NPROF. --hroest 13:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not seeing enough to warrant a pass of WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet WP:GNG. Too few news sources. Peter303x (talk) 01:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. --Devoke water 10:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.