Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azhaggiye Thee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Izno (talk) 03:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Azhaggiye Thee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced film. Facebook, Cinema.my, and Youtube are not reliable sources. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Hello user, you are probably a user from Tamil Nadu, I am a Malaysian myself. I believe Malaysian Tamil language films article are very notable, as all of them are released nationwide in Malaysia, there are sources, our local media have reportings about these films. It is not like student film, it is REAL theatrical films, no reason for not being notable. I feel terribly sad that you want to nominate the deletion of all these articles, most contributed by me. I believe all these can stay. And, the article is well-written and well-cited, plus with good formatting. I WILL ADD MORE RELIABLE SOURCES. You could just add reference tag. Please reconsider and unnominate the deletion, thank you so much ;) User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM 04:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

India's Indian films and Malaysia's Indian films should not withstand the same standards of notability. You must have known these films is very significant in my countries. Although those cited websites are not news website, they are still media website that reports, making these films notable. Meanwhile, these articles are shorter, BUT you may realized that they are really written properly.

For Azhaggiye Thee:
TamilMirchi (talk · contribs) Latest Please read the latest version, I have removed sources from Facebook, and added 3 more source. 1 external film review website, 2 notable news websites Malaysia Kini, Malaysia Gazette which are reliable sources. // Added IMDB title, remove other excess external links --User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep a full review has now been added to the referencing as well as significant coverage in The Malaysian Gattee so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - 2 reliable sources cover this film at length Spiderone 15:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Regarding WP:Films, "the film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics". Rollo De Pelicula is not a nationally known critic. TamilMirchi (talk) 19:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Rollo De Pelicula is kinda known in my country, please don't use your own loathly standards to judge. Also added 1 Anegun source. User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM

• It can also pass WP:GNG which you should have found in your WP:BEFORE, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.