Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awni Al-Otoom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awni Al-Otoom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this person certainly exists, I cannot myself find sufficient indicia of notability for his academic career (assistant professor) or more recent career as an inspector. Others are welcome to try. Tagged for notability for over a year. Epeefleche (talk) 04:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Article created by user "Awniotoom", suggesting a possible autobiography. Regards, RJH (talk) 04:22, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Astute observation. Furthermore, the creator is an SPA.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 13:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Sources provided do not establish notability, and a Google search turned up nothing promising. Looks like self promotion. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 06:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.