Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avisoft Fibre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:43, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Avisoft Fibre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company -- minor internet provider with no substantial 3rd party references -- just an entry on a list DGG ( talk ) 18:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I couldn't find any references either. Non-notable private company. Fails WP:CORP. MB (talk) 06:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORP. almost a speedy. LibStar (talk) 10:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as my analysis has also shown nothing at all convincing for any minimal notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into TPG post merger acquisitions section and replace with a redirect. The article subject is not notable on its own. (TPG Telecom article is also out of date.) Aoziwe (talk) 10:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.