Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Average attendance for cricket clubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Average attendance for cricket clubs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure about this, but Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Adam9007 (talk) 20:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 05:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definitely not what an encyclopaedia article/list should be. Attendance is something that can and is documented in individual club/team pages, and that's about all there should be to it. —SpacemanSpiff 05:09, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced fanboy cruft. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete POV. --Dweller (talk) 08:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unreferenced and violates of What Wikipedia is not. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 00:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.