Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ave Fenix Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:46, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ave Fenix Pictures

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable film company, the sole source that this hinges on for notability, from Chicago Tribune is not only a local piece but an op-ed combined with an interview. There is 0 in depth coverage (also worth noting that this topic has long been a target of a certain paid editing ring) It's three films also don't appear to be notable despite having articles. Praxidicae (talk) 13:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Raza filmmaking, some concept/movement/idea allegedly invented by Ave Fenix Pictures or its participants --Closeapple (talk) 04:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. I had actually been planning to do an AfD for this and their La Raza film making "movement." It's nice to see someone else did one for them. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.