Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Rose

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ava Rose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards, just nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. No nontrivial reliably sourced biographical content. Tendentiously deprodded by the usual suspect. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails PORNBIO as the nominator states. Fails GNG with coverage coming from republished press releases in the porn trade press. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator's rationale. Cavarrone 20:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I simply see nothing better. Pinging interested subject user Davey2010. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - As stunning as she is unfortunately looks don't count towards notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010Talk 09:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Concur with nominator's analysis. Finnegas (talk) 18:42, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.