Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australia Times

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 20:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australia Times

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources provided are all self-published, and I can't find any reliable sources myself. The "online newspaper" itself appears just to link to BBC articles, rather than exist as creative journalistic entity. WP:ORG. Contested prod. Electrified Fooling Machine (talk) 10:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, don't see how this link farm could meet WP:WEB. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. per nom and Lankiveil. there are Afds for two related articles BestAddress HTML Editor and Multimedia Australia . John Vandenberg ^(chat) 08:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage about this web site. -- Whpq (talk) 14:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.