Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auralia (Ear Training Software) (2nd nomination)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Sibelius Software. Redirecting per WP:NSUPER Consider this a no consensus close. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Auralia (Ear Training Software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedy declined. Last AFD had no discussion whatsoever after two weeks. Written like an advertising; anyone who uses "award winning" should be slapped with a trout for one of the most overused and meaningless phrases in history. Sources are thin. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - support the merge to Sibelius Software as proposed by AndrewWTaylor in Afd that was just closed as no consensus. Reasoning - this product is currently distributed by Sibelius Software, and as written is largely promotional in content, with a lot of overly specific information (hardware requirements, etc.)Dialectric (talk) 12:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.