Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aunt Betty Woot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Feel free to request restoration when principal photo has begun and the film is covered in multiple reliable, secondary sources. czar 06:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aunt Betty Woot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly not notable. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this new short film as being premature for Wikipedia... at best a case of Too Soon... and a problem suffered by many short films by and starring unknowns. We can allow a return only when and if WP:NF can be met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 14:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but Userfy for the editor. If NF is met, they can move it back later. If not, csd. Montanabw^(talk) 19:37, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.