Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack of Life: The Bang Tango Movie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Attack of Life: The Bang Tango Movie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I dug through all the references (there are plenty) and nearly all of them point to unreliable blogs. The one exception is to an LA Weekly write up where the subject (this documentary) is mentioned in passing, exactly once and the article is quite obvious;y not about about the movie, making it not in-depth coverage. For these reasons, and with my preliminary news search, this seems to fall short of WP:FILM. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 21:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have added more references. Hopefully this will help. Thatguy1987 (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Although the film never had an official release, it had garnered enough attention to still be reviewed and written about positively on many respectable music websites such as Blabbermouth, Metal Sludge, Bravewords, Sleazeroxx, KNAC, etc. which I have added more references for. Plus the story around the making of the film was interesting enough for the filmmaker to be interviewed on many of these sites as well. Also the coverage the film has recieved dates back to 2012(Blabbermouth reference) and is as recent as May 2018(Rock out with your Doc Out reference); for a film that has never been given an official release, that showcases notability in my opinion. Thatguy1987 (talk) 12:37, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:37, 25 May 2018 (UTC)i[reply]

Keep. The references may be good enough now, but perhaps add a tag to seek more references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by G.scaringi (talk • contribs) 18:37, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article has been significantly improved since coming to AFD with the addition of multiple reliable sources with direct and significant coverage so it passes WP:GNG, thanks 20:15, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Keep On the basis of the article in its current form, the film seems to meet the GNG, even if it might be on the edge of WP:NFILM. Chetsford (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.